Simulation Workflow

Simulation studies typically involve the following workflow (Morris, White, & Crowther, 2019):

The flowchart below depicts the workflow. The chart is created using grViz() from the DiagrammeR package (Iannone, 2020).

0.1 Initial Experimental Design

Before we begin working on the simulation study, we should decide what model and design parameters we want to vary. Parameters can include sample size, proportion of missing data etc.

0.2 Data Generating Model

The data-generating function below takes in model parameters. For example, we can generate data varying the sample size or level of heteroskedasticity or the amount of missingness. Below is a skeleton of the data-generating function. The arguments are any data-generating parameters that we would want to vary.

generate_dat <- function(model_params) {

  return(dat)
}

Below is an example where we generate random normal data for two groups, where the second group has a standard deviation twice as large as that of the first group. The function takes in three arguments: n1, indicating sample size for Group 1, n2 indicating sample size for Group 2, and mean_diff, indicating the mean difference.

generate_dat <- function(n1, n2, mean_diff){

  dat <- tibble(
    y = c(rnorm(n = n1, mean_diff, 1), # mean diff as mean, sd 1
          rnorm(n = n2, 0, 2)), # mean 0, sd 2
    group = c(rep("Group 1", n1), rep("Group 2", n2))
  )

  return(dat)

}

After creating the data-generating function, we should check whether it works. Below, we generate an example dataset with 10,000 people in each group and the mean_diff set to 1.

set.seed(2020143)
example_dat <- generate_dat(n1 = 10000, n2= 10000, mean_diff = 1) 

example_dat %>%
  head()
#> # A tibble: 6 × 2
#>        y group  
#>    <dbl> <chr>  
#> 1  0.491 Group 1
#> 2 -0.534 Group 1
#> 3  1.02  Group 1
#> 4  0.754 Group 1
#> 5  0.762 Group 1
#> 6  0.979 Group 1

Below, we create a summary table. The mean of the outcome for Group 1 is close to 1 and the mean for Group 2 is close to 0. The standard deviation of the outcome for Group 1 is close to 1 and the standard deviation for Group 2 is close to 2. The table matches what we specified in the data-generating model.

example_dat %>%
  group_by(group) %>%
  summarize(n = n(),
            M = mean(y),
            SD = sd(y)) %>%
  kable(digits = 3)

group	n	M	SD
Group 1	10000	0.998	0.996
Group 2	10000	-0.014	2.028

Below we create a density plot of the values that we generated for each of the groups. The distributions seem normal. The peaks seem to have a difference of 1. And, the variances of the outcome scores are different for each group as we specified.

ggplot(example_dat, aes(x = y, fill = group)) + 
  geom_density(alpha = .5) + 
  labs(x = "Outcome Scores", y = "Density", fill = "Group") + 
  theme_bw() +
  theme(legend.position = c(0.9, 0.8))

0.3 Estimation Methods

In this step, we run some statistical methods to calculate test statistics, regression coefficients, p-values, or confidence intervals. The function takes in the data and any design parameters, such as options for how estimation should be carried out (e.g., use HC0 standard errors or HC2 standard errors).

estimate <- function(dat, design_params) {

  return(results)
}

Below is an example function that runs t-tests on a simulated dataset. The function runs a conventional t-test, which assumes homogeneity of variance, and a Welch t-test, which does not assume that the population variances of the outcome for the two groups are equal. The function returns a tibble containing the names of the two methods, mean difference estimates, p-values, and upper and lower bounds of the confidence intervals. We could use the t.test() function to extract everything we need. This function implements the calculations directly (using sample statistics) mostly just for fun. A further reason is that the t.test() function does a lot of extra stuff to handle contingencies that come up with real data (like missing observations), but which are unnecessary when running calculations with simulated data.

# t and p value
calc_t <- function(est, vd, df, method){

  se <- sqrt(vd)  # standard error 
  t <- est / se # t-test 
  p_val <-  2 * pt(-abs(t), df = df) # p value
  ci <- est + c(-1, 1) * qt(.975, df = df) * se # confidence interval
  
  res <- tibble(method = method, est = est, p_val = p_val, 
                lower_bound = ci[1], upper_bound = ci[2])

  return(res)
}


estimate <- function(dat, n1, n2){

  # calculate summary stats
  means <- tapply(dat$y, dat$group, mean)
  vars <- tapply(dat$y, dat$group, var)

  # calculate summary stats
  est <- means[1] - means[2] # mean diff
  var_1 <- vars[1] # var for group 1
  var_2 <- vars[2] # var for group 2

  # conventional t-test
  dft <- n1 + n2 - 2  # degrees of freedom
  sp_sq <- ((n1 - 1) * var_1 + (n2 - 1) * var_2) / dft  # pooled var
  vdt <- sp_sq * (1 / n1 + 1 / n2) # variance of estimate

  # welch t-test
  dfw <- (var_1 / n1 + var_2 / n2)^2 / (((1 / (n1 - 1)) * (var_1 / n1)^2) + ((1 / (n2 - 1)) * (var_2 / n2)^2))  # degrees of freedom 
  vdw <- var_1 / n1 + var_2 / n2 # variance of estimate

  results <- bind_rows(calc_t(est = est, vd = vdt, df = dft, method = "t-test"),
                   calc_t(est = est, vd = vdw, df = dfw, method = "Welch t-test"))


  return(results)

}

Here again, it would be good to check if the function runs as it should. Below we run the estimate() function on the example dataset:

est_res <- 
  estimate(example_dat, n1 = 10000, n2 = 10000) %>%
  mutate_if(is.numeric, round, 5)

est_res
#> # A tibble: 2 × 5
#>   method         est p_val lower_bound upper_bound
#>   <chr>        <dbl> <dbl>       <dbl>       <dbl>
#> 1 t-test        1.01     0       0.967        1.06
#> 2 Welch t-test  1.01     0       0.967        1.06

We can compare the results to those from the built-in t.test() function:

t_res <- 
  bind_rows(
    tidy(t.test(y ~ group, data = example_dat, var.equal = TRUE)), 
    tidy(t.test(y ~ group, data = example_dat))
  ) %>%
  mutate(
    estimate = estimate1 - estimate2, 
    method = c("t-test", "Welch t-test")
  ) %>%
  select(method, est = estimate, p_val = p.value, lower_bound = conf.low, upper_bound = conf.high) %>%
  mutate_if(is.numeric, round, 5)

t_res
#> # A tibble: 2 × 5
#>   method         est p_val lower_bound upper_bound
#>   <chr>        <dbl> <dbl>       <dbl>       <dbl>
#> 1 t-test        1.01     0       0.967        1.06
#> 2 Welch t-test  1.01     0       0.967        1.06

The values match.

0.3.1 Convergence Issues

If we were to estimate complicated models, like structural equation modeling or hierarchical linear modeling, there may be cases where the model does not converge. To handle such cases, we can add an if...else statement within the estimate() function that evaluates whether the model converged and if it did not converge, the statement outputs NA values for estimates, p-values etc.

estimate <- function(dat, design_parameters){
  
  # write estimation models here
  # e.g., fit_mimic <- lavaan::cfa(...)
  
  
  # convergence 
  if(fit_mimic@optim$converged == FALSE){  # this syntax will depend on how the specific model stores convergence
    res <- tibble(method = method, est = NA, p_val = NA, 
                  lower_bound = NA, upper_bound = NA)
  } else{
    res <- tibble(method = method, est = est, p_val = p_val, 
                  lower_bound = ci[1], upper_bound = ci[2])
  }
  
  return(res)

}

0.4 Performance Summaries

In this step, we create a function to calculate performance measures based on results that we extracted from the estimation step, repeated across many replications. As the skeleton below indicates, a performance summary function takes in the results, along with any model parameters, and returns a dataset of performance measures.

calc_performance <- function(results, model_params) {

  return(performance_measures)
}

The function below fills in the calc_performance() function. We use the calc_rejection() function in the simhelpers package to calculate rejection rates.

calc_performance <- function(results) {
  
  performance_measures <- results %>%
    group_by(method) %>%
    group_modify(~ calc_rejection(.x, p_values = p_val))

  return(performance_measures)
}

0.5 Simulation Driver

The following code chunk sets up the simulation driver. The arguments specify the number of iterations for the simulation and any parameters needed to run the data-generating and estimating functions. The function then generates many sets of results by repeating the data-generating step and estimation step. Finally, the function calculates the performance measures and returns results for this set of parameters.

run_sim <- function(iterations, model_params, design_params, seed = NULL) {
  if (!is.null(seed)) set.seed(seed)

  results <-
    rerun(iterations, {
      dat <- generate_dat(model_params)
      estimate(dat, design_params)
    }) %>%
    bind_rows()

  calc_performance(results, model_params)
}

Below is the driver for our example simulation study:

run_sim <- function(iterations, n1, n2, mean_diff, seed = NULL) {
  if (!is.null(seed)) set.seed(seed)

  results <-
    rerun(iterations, {
      dat <- generate_dat(n1 = n1, n2 = n2, mean_diff = mean_diff)
      estimate(dat = dat, n1 = n1, n2 = n2)
    }) %>%
    bind_rows()
  
  calc_performance(results)

}

0.6 Experimental Design Revisit

Now that we have all our functions in order, we can specify the exact factors we want to manipulate in the study. The following code chunk creates a list of design factors and uses the cross_df() function from purrr package to create every combination of the factor levels. We also set the number of iterations and the seed that will be used when generating data (Wickham et al., 2019).

set.seed(20150316) # change this seed value!

# now express the simulation parameters as vectors/lists

design_factors <- list(factor1 = , factor2 = , ...) # combine into a design set

params <-
  cross_df(design_factors) %>%
  mutate(
    iterations = 1000,  # change this to how many ever iterations  
    seed = round(runif(1) * 2^30) + 1:n()
  )

# All look right?
lengths(design_factors)
nrow(params)
head(params)

The code below specifies three design factors: n1, which specifies the sample size for Group 1, n2, which specifies the sample size for Group 2, and mean_diff, which denotes the mean difference between two groups on an outcome. These are the between simulation factors. The within-simulation factor is the t-test method with one assuming equal variance and one not assuming equal variance.

set.seed(20200110)

# now express the simulation parameters as vectors/lists

design_factors <- list(
  n1 = 50,
  n2 = c(50, 70),
  mean_diff = c(0, .5, 1, 2)
)
params <-
  cross_df(design_factors) %>%
  mutate(
    iterations = 1000,
    seed = round(runif(1) * 2^30) + 1:n()
  )


# All look right?
lengths(design_factors)
#>        n1        n2 mean_diff 
#>         1         2         4
nrow(params)
#> [1] 8
head(params)
#> # A tibble: 6 × 5
#>      n1    n2 mean_diff iterations      seed
#>   <dbl> <dbl>     <dbl>      <dbl>     <dbl>
#> 1    50    50       0         1000 204809087
#> 2    50    70       0         1000 204809088
#> 3    50    50       0.5       1000 204809089
#> 4    50    70       0.5       1000 204809090
#> 5    50    50       1         1000 204809091
#> 6    50    70       1         1000 204809092

0.7 Running the Simulation in Serial

Here we run the simulation using purrr package serial workflow. We use the pmap() function from purrr to run the run_sim() function on each condition specified in params.

system.time(
  results <- 
    params %>%
    mutate(
      res = pmap(., .f = run_sim)
    ) %>%
    unnest(cols = res)
)
#>    user  system elapsed 
#>  42.745   0.466  50.198

results %>%
  kable()

n1	n2	mean_diff	iterations	seed	method	K	rej_rate	rej_rate_mcse
50	50	0.0	1000	204809087	Welch t-test	1000	0.047	0.0066926
50	50	0.0	1000	204809087	t-test	1000	0.048	0.0067599
50	70	0.0	1000	204809088	Welch t-test	1000	0.039	0.0061220
50	70	0.0	1000	204809088	t-test	1000	0.027	0.0051255
50	50	0.5	1000	204809089	Welch t-test	1000	0.335	0.0149256
50	50	0.5	1000	204809089	t-test	1000	0.340	0.0149800
50	70	0.5	1000	204809090	Welch t-test	1000	0.426	0.0156373
50	70	0.5	1000	204809090	t-test	1000	0.341	0.0149906
50	50	1.0	1000	204809091	Welch t-test	1000	0.871	0.0106000
50	50	1.0	1000	204809091	t-test	1000	0.876	0.0104223
50	70	1.0	1000	204809092	Welch t-test	1000	0.937	0.0076832
50	70	1.0	1000	204809092	t-test	1000	0.904	0.0093158
50	50	2.0	1000	204809093	Welch t-test	1000	1.000	0.0000000
50	50	2.0	1000	204809093	t-test	1000	1.000	0.0000000
50	70	2.0	1000	204809094	Welch t-test	1000	1.000	0.0000000
50	70	2.0	1000	204809094	t-test	1000	1.000	0.0000000

0.8 Running the Simulation in Parallel

Below we use the future and the furrr packages to run the simulation in parallel (Bengtsson, 2020; Vaughan & Dancho, 2018). These packages are designed to work with functions from the purrr package. The line below gets a cluster set up on your computer or network. For more complicated network setups, please see the documentation for the future package.

plan(multisession)

Once the cluster is configured, we can just replace pmap() from purrr with future_pmap() to run the simulation in parallel.

library(future)
library(furrr)

plan(multisession) # choose an appropriate plan from the future package

system.time(
  results <-
    params %>%
    mutate(res = future_pmap(., .f = run_sim)) %>%
    unnest(cols = res)
)

In the simhelpers package, we have a function, evaluate_by_row(), that implements this furrr workflow automatically:

plan(multisession)
results <- evaluate_by_row(params, run_sim)